Previous Entries? Next Entries? I’m confused.
A common feature on every blog you see is a pair of links at the bottom of the page that let you move forward and backward in the stream of posts. Typically on the first page it’s just one link to previous entries. But on the second page there is a link for previous entries and for next entries. The “previous” link continues to take you “backwards” in the post stream. But the “next” link is tempting as that’s the natural thing we are trained to want to click. There’s this weird discordant moment. Maybe the accidental extra page views amount to enough so publishers value the confusion. But I know as a user I find it annoying. I surveyed three popular blogs (as well as our own) to see who does what.
TechCrunch and ValleyWag both have the confusing terminology. Here at Jackson Fish I think we have better terminology using “older” and “newer” which I think syncs with what’s in people’s heads as they browse past blog posts (in either direction). My favorite treatment however was boingboing. They take advantage of the fact that they break their pages up by the day so they can use the calendar to show where you’re at, where you’ve been, and where you want to go. They even use “day earlier” and “day later” descriptions of each choice which gives things a kind of narrative quality. It ends up a touch busy, but I think nice overall.
I realize this is a small user interface issue in the grand scheme of things, but I think that a few of these small issues can add up to an annoying experience. And conversely, getting these details right can make users of a site feel right at home.
UPDATE: Had another thought on this. A nice visualization to reinforce the navigation would be the new column of entries sliding in from either side depending on which direction the user was traveling in the stream. Of course, it would have to be done in a way that didn’t break the back button, and resulted in you starting at the top of the next or previous earlier or later column of entries.
Join the discussion 5 Comments
Tom Tokarski
October 24, 2007 at 11:05 am
Agree….and a similar concept that trips me up is the relative location of ‘old’ and ‘new’.
I’ve always thought of ‘old’ as being to the left (or up), and ‘new’ as being to the right (or down). This is also reinforced in a typical calendar…. tomorrow is to the right of today…. next month is to the right or below this month, etc…
But, in email clients, feed readers, etc…. new stuff is generally at the top and you go ‘down’ to get to progressively older stuff. Flickr also trips me up….. my newest pictures are at left, and then I move right to get to older pictures.
Tom Tokarski
October 24, 2007 at 11:37 am
Addendum / clarification to my comment: in Flickr (when viewing picture thumbnails), newest pics are at top left, and as you move right / down, you get to progressively older pictures. Then in the photostream widget, newest is at far right, and older are to left. Seems inconsistent / contradictory.
Maybe I’m just over-analyzing….
Marcelo Calbucci
October 24, 2007 at 11:41 am
I agree with Tom, terminology for me is a lesser problem than the position of next/prev. Somehow, I expect to go through the pages of a book by flipping the page on the right. Since blog is reverse chronology, “previous entries” or “a day earlier” or “older entries” should be on the right.
Hillel
October 24, 2007 at 10:33 pm
Unless of course you read a blog from the beginning. (Though I imagine 99.99% of blog reading is done in reverse chronological order.)
Dorne
June 18, 2008 at 1:43 pm
I have no problem with “a day earlier” and “a day later”, or “older entry” and “newer entry”. It’s just previous and next that bothers me… Some say next page even when it’s the latest page. This inconsistency.
Props for probably the only blog to talk about this (or I’m just a lazy googler).